I took the plunge. I am a blogger. I blog. Ich bloge gern.
In truth I had been considering this for awhile, but Al Gore pushed me over the edge. I finished his book, The Assault on Reason, just last night and decided right then and there to take the plunge. He presented many well-reasoned points in the book, but his discussion about what our culture considers news and how political dialogue through television resembles a one-way street really hit me. The answer: The two-way political forum offered by the internet.
I grew very tired of the kinds of stories that dominate even the most reputable news sources. How could anyone care so much about where that certain celebrity (rhymes with Ranah my Cole) will finally be buried when we are now losing tens of soldiers every day in a controversial and arguably immoral war? I found that it actually took effort to find real news about the war and the immensely important fight brewing about the meaning of separation of powers. That's sad, but not as sad as the realization that our indifference has led us to repeat history.
As Archibald Cox said after being fired as special prosecutor by Richard M. Nixon, this nation stands on the verge of making a decision about whether it is a nation of men or a nation of laws. I believe we are again at that point for this nation. I consider that issue to be of paramount importance. A gauntlet has been thrown to the ground by the executive branch in a stated-effort to strengthen that branch of government to a point at which it would be almost un-checkable. I consider this very time to be a defining moment. How the other branches respond to this challenge will be reviewed in history books for future generations. And I can't find coverage of it through the smoke-screen of a multi-millionaire and her 23 day prison term.
Simply stated, it's time to talk about these things. It's time for everyone to realize that these issues will influence each and every citizen. It's time to wake up. I want dialogue. Open, cordial, well-thought, well-reasoned dialogue. I want Adams-Jefferson-type back and forth. I've been looking for that for years, so my expectations are realistic.
But that isn't the only purpose for my blog. I welcome political discourse and look forward to actual debate, but I hope to explore other topics as well. I titled the blog "prelude to a book" because I have a vision for a project and want to use this forum to develop it. I hope to post a series of essays about topics that interest me. Most will deal with political questions, but not all of the essays will be political. Some will be about those I look up to and lessons learned from those individuals. I hope to challenge my own beliefs by articulating why I believe what I believe on a number of issues. I hope to even alter some beliefs based on further examination. I will also discuss political evolution of a person over factors of time and education using the only experience at my disposal (my own). Finally, I hope to muse about interests I have ranging from chess to sports.
I encourage posts in German if anyone out there can speak it. I look forward to any point of view so long as it is well reasoned.
I must not conclude without mention of my lovely wife Jen and my son Jacob. They are the most important people in the world to me. It is out of concern for the world Jacob will inherit that I contemplate so often politically.
I have no idea how often I will have occasion to post. But vibrant discussion will drastically increase posts.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I'm telling you. Some day I'm going to be calling you Governor, or Senator, instead of simply Punk. Still don't like Gore, but if he talked you into the blog, he did something right.
um. listen lawyer boy, you leave poor anna nicole ALONE. she's DEAD.
sniff sniff
Can't you understand, she was Marilyn all over again.
And dam.... ok, i can't keep going. just don't have the heart.
welcome to the information age. We've been waiting for you :)
It's Richie from the Remember the Titans NFL League.
Ich habe das Al Gore Buch gestern gekauft aber noch nicht gelesen. O.K. enough German. It's nice to see that someone out there is still paying attention to the news of the day & reflecting on what truly makes this country great. I am not a flag-waver & I agree with you on many accounts regarding the selling of the War.
I guess I'll be the first to address the preemptive war comments. Since early 2001, I have been an advocate for a preemptive war against the Sudan. In March of 2001, I visited the Sudanese Mission to the United Nations for a discussion of policy and was quickly informed of their support for Al-Qaida, Hezbollah, and the Intifada. Not only were they supporters, but they were proud of this. To make a long story short, I was for an invasion of the Sudan in lieu of Iraq. If we were really fighting the "War on Terrorism" there was no reason not to follow Afghanistan w/ the Sudan. Not only could we sell the war to the world as the war on terrorism, we could also cite the human rights violations in the Darfur Region and the battles of the Sudanese People's Liberation Army (SPLA) as well. This would have enabled us to claim the moral high ground as well.
Dude, I'll stop here... don't wanna Bogart your blog.
THANK YOU for the comment. I had hoped for comments like yours.
I guess I would say that, in light of 9-11, what you proposed doesn't sound like preemptive war. It sounds like going after those who struck us. Sounds like finishing a fight we didn't start. Sounds like Afghanistan again.
I still don't like the idea of invading, overthrowing and occupying, but the moral high ground would have been there for a strike of some sort on those organizations and pressure (military or otherwise) on a regime providing shelter to them.
I am also convinced we wouldn't have had to do that alone (actual response to an attack, humanitarian help for Darfur, etc.). I supported Afghanistan War because it was a direct and logical response. I certainly don't consider that a preemptive war. They earned that response.
Finally, the UN would help us with the rebuilding and would be viewed with legitimacy.
I can't commit to support an action against Sudan without looking further into it (and obviously not while Iraq is going on), but I could see that kind of argument closer to 9-11. Sounds like you had a first-hand look at it, though.
Thanks again for jumping in.
Post a Comment